False Allegations And Deception in The Law – Part I

I was recently at Fort Carson, Colorado. I came across a flyer from the Department of Justice titled “False Allegations of Adult Crimes Reference Guide.” The flyer has prompted me to write about false allegations and deception. This Part I will provide the data from the Department of Justice. The data apparently came from the FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit and National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime. The primary motivations and indicators section below provides a great resource for closing arguments in military court-martials. The Department of Justice flyer on false allegations provided the following data on false allegations: “Offender Characteristics -Most likely white (93%) -Majority are female (73%) male (27%) -Average age was 30 and the most frequent age was 41 -At the time of the offense, 27% had documented mental illness (depression most common), all female -At least 43% had a HS education/GED Marital status by gender: -Females, married (18%), never married (50%) -Males, married (89%), never married 30% first marriage, 10% cohabitating/significant relationship -Full-time employment (60%), part-time (3.3%), student (3%), unemployed (17%) -No known substance abuse (63%), alcohol only (10%) -Most common life problem prior to false allegation: -Marital problems/conflict 63% -Financial problems 33% -Mental health issues 23% -Alcohol/drugs 13% -Unemployment/recent loss of job 13% -27% have made at least one prior false allegation; rape/sexual assault (10%), stalking (10%), physical assault (7%), threats (7%) -23% have been arrested at least once including charges such as theft/larceny, drugs/narcotics, trespassing, assault/battery -In 73% of cases, the offender brought the case to the attention of law enforcement: sexual assault (73%), abduction (27%), threats (20%), stalking (17%), attempted murder (10%), extortion (7%), physical assault (7%), hate crime (3%), other (13%). -Over half (53%) of the cases involved two types of offenses. -In 73% of cases, there are indications of pre-planning/preparation -Half of the offenses involved more than one location -Evidence of physical trauma is reflected in 30% of the cases to include blunt force trauma, edged weapon, ligature strangulation, gunshot wound, burn (fire or chemical) -Sexual trauma is rare; however, when observed there is trauma to the vaginal cavity, foreign object insertion or breast/nipple lacerations -Evidence of staging in more than half the cases (60%) to include ransacking, vandalism, threat letters, burglary, use of an explosive device, and carjacking Primary Motivation for the Offenses -Interpersonal violent allegations (e.g. sexual assault) were primarily motivated by attention/sympathy (50%), whereas interpersonal offenses (e.g. arson, theft) involved other motivations such as providing an alibi (17%), mental illness/depression (13%), profit (13%), and revenge (7%) Investigative Suggestions -Conduct 2 prong investigation -Continue logical investigation to determine if there is, in fact, a legitimate offender -Conduct a discrete, parallel investigation to determine/identify the life problems of the false allegation offender Interview Strategies -The interview strategy is depending on the motivation of the offender. An investigator would approach an offender motivated by an internal need for attention/sympathy far differently than one motivated by financial gain or revenue -Emphasize the life problems of the offender Possible Indicators of False Allegations -Inconsistent statements by the offender -Deception on polygraph -Witness statements that conflict with the offender -Lack of plausibility in the deception of the reported offense -Lack of substantiating forensic, physical, and/or medical evidence”