Blog

Defending Military Members Worldwide

Recent News

  • Marijuana Detection Windows

    Feb 5, 2016
    Here is some background information on marijuana. Keep in mind things like frequency of use, hydration, quantity, and type can all affect detection windows. These are just general guidelines that we typically hear toxicologists testify to. EXAMPLES OF MARIJUANA DETECTION WINDOWS ​Schedule I ​Cutoff – 15ng/ml Detection windows ​Light use – 1-3 days Moderate use...
    View Article  
  • Family Advocacy and the Central Registry Board

    Feb 3, 2016
    We regularly receive phone calls from concerned service members with questions about the Family Advocacy Program and Central Registry Board. I received another one today and decided to update our page with some frequently asked questions. Here are some of the more frequently asked questions: 1. I received notification of a Central Registry Board Incident Determination,...
    View Article  
  • AS OF SEPTEMBER 2015, THE MARINE Corps had a 22% Conviction Rate in Positive Urinalysis Drug Courts-Martial

    Feb 1, 2016
    Last week we did a Marine Corps administrative separation board for a staff sergeant who tested positive for cocaine in an amount of 121ng/ml. That’s a pretty low amount. We were successful. The board found no basis for separation. During the course of the notification process, a memorandum was sent to us (probably inadvertently) indicating Marine...
    View Article  
  • Military Rule of Evidence 412 Basics

    Jan 19, 2016
    Mil. R. Evid. 412 limits the extent to which an accused in a sexual assault case can introduce evidence regarding the alleged victim’s prior sexual behavior. The rule, however, carves out three exceptions. Under Mil. R. Evid. 412 (b)(1), the following evidence is admissible: (A)evidence of specific instances of sexual behavior by the alleged victim offered to...
    View Article  
  • Unlawful Command Influence Basics

    Jan 19, 2016
    We often get questions about what constitutes unlawful command influence. Here are some basics about how UCI functions in a court-martial. The defense, as the moving party, under United States v. Biagase, 50 M.J. 143, 150 (1999), bears the initial burden of eliciting “some evidence” of “facts which, if true, constitute unlawful command influence, and that the...
    View Article  
  • Innocent Oral Ingestion of Cocaine

    Jan 15, 2016
    This week Mr. Conway will be doing an administrative separation board involving the innocent oral ingestion of cocaine. Often, prospective clients call us indicating that the have no idea how they tested positive for cocaine. Nearly always the amount of cocaine metabolite detected in their system was minimal.I’m frequently reminded of the now famous Randy...
    View Article  
  • Nice Win This Week

    Jan 8, 2016
    Mr. Conway had a nice result in Washington DC this week. It was an officer case involving a positive urinalysis for Percocet (oxymorphone). We originally turned down Captain’s Mast and demanded a court-martial. The jury found the client not guilty of wrongfully using oxymorphone.
    View Article  
  • Combat Jobs Open to All Service Members

    Dec 3, 2015
    The U.S. military opens combat positions to women Today will go down as a historic day in military justice circles. The Secretary of Defense has opened all combat occupational specialties to women. Policy arguments aside. A whole host of new legal questions are sure to flow from this decision.For example, will all women now be...
    View Article  
  • Spence’s Op’ed in USA Today

    Nov 29, 2015
    Garry Spence authored an interesting op-ed in USA Today. I attended the Death Penalty Seminar at Spence’s Trial Lawyers’ College. He is, without question, one of the great defense attorneys of our time. I have very little to disagree with in Spence’s op-ed. He cites to Mullenix v. Luna. Luna was a case involving a drunk driver fleeing...
    View Article  
  • Investigating Officer Appointed in the Kunduz Hospital Bombing Case

    Nov 24, 2015
    An investigating officer has been appointed to investigate the bombing of the hospital in Kunduz. I have previously been quoted in the Washington Examiner that it’s going to be hard to identify individuals responsible. Targeting decisions are such a complex and high-level process. Assigning criminal liability will be difficult. But, I’m sure this will end some careers. See...
    View Article